NGC1977 & M42

CCD vs Film? Lots of time vs no patience? Alright, this is your place to discuss all the astrophotography what's and what's not. You can discuss about techniques, accessories, cameras, whatever....just make sure you also post some nice photos here too!
User avatar
Enterprise
Posts: 89
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 3:05 am
Location: Singapore, Marine Parade (ECP)

Post by Enterprise »

love the colors! [smilie=admire2.gif]
User avatar
CHINKAHSHIUAN
Posts: 23
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 1:15 am
Location: Singaproe

Post by CHINKAHSHIUAN »

Nice Picture!! Actually I have took the M42-43 photos yesterday. Can you please explain to me how you edit it? I really need your help! Thank you. :)
KS.Chin

Celestron CPC 800
WO Megrez 72mm Doublet DDG
Celestron SkyMaster 15x70 binocular

Blog: http://ksastronomy.blogspot.com

"Learn together, Share Together"
User avatar
cataclysm
Posts: 1024
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:23 pm

Post by cataclysm »

Nice Picture!! Actually I have took the M42-43 photos yesterday. Can you please explain to me how you edit it? I really need your help! Thank you.
I use Nebulosity to capture, calibrate and stack the sub images. Then RGB combined and further tweakings with Photoshop. Orion nebula has a very wide dynamic range, its very bright in the core, but the outer nebulous tendril are pretty faint. I had separate exposures for the core and the outer regions and then layer combine them with photoshop. :)
User avatar
timatworksg
Posts: 767
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:42 pm
Location: Pasir Ris

Post by timatworksg »

Nice work in the process cataclysm. Yes M42 has a very wide dynamic range and layering the different exposures bring the whole image too life! Nice work in PS!

@CHINKAHSHIUAN
For something like M42, subs are taken at different exposure lengths. Short sometimes 10-30s subs to expose the core, 1-2mins for the outer regions, 5mins for luminance and the tendrils, darks for all exposures, flats for all exposures...sometimes different exposures for LRGB channels. Then masters are created for each exposure stack, then combined in the software or in PS whichever is easier. In PS, one master is used with the core exposed nicely and layered with the nicely exposed outer region, etc etc...masking is applied to subtly bring out the detail! Then flattened and levels adjusted to taste!
My wife never complained about how much time, effort & money I spent on my Astronomy hobby!................suddenly I met her!!!
User avatar
cataclysm
Posts: 1024
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:23 pm

Post by cataclysm »

Thanks Tim, you are very thorough in you explanation. :)
User avatar
timatworksg
Posts: 767
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:42 pm
Location: Pasir Ris

Post by timatworksg »

Erm,..np thanks! If you have a different approach please edit or subtract as needed! I could have made it worse and gone into details..lol!

Besides masking and layering is a Digital Imaging thing and used in various ways for hiding blemishes, allowing different exposures to come through and giving more depth of field to an image, just to name a few. Very common in product photography where you see items such as watches all evenly illuminated and exposed without any glow or shine from lighting! Different exposures for each area and masked away!
Kinda like bumps and bruises on pretty gals on mag covers which we never get to see! haha!

Must come K'po during one of your imaging runs bro! I still have room to learn more on Astro Imaging! If you don't mind that is...lol!
My wife never complained about how much time, effort & money I spent on my Astronomy hobby!................suddenly I met her!!!
chip
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 10:34 am
Contact:

Post by chip »

Nice. [smilie=hell-yes.gif]
Post Reply