Sedili Time Lapse

CCD vs Film? Lots of time vs no patience? Alright, this is your place to discuss all the astrophotography what's and what's not. You can discuss about techniques, accessories, cameras, whatever....just make sure you also post some nice photos here too!
User avatar
jiahao1986
Posts: 474
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 10:59 pm
Location: Clementi

Post by jiahao1986 »

Gary wrote:Beautiful time-lapse! Give me Milky Way skies + some haze + some light dome anytime over observing in cloudy Singapore right inside the light dome! lol :)

Looking forward to time-lapse with panning in your future attempts. Keep up the good work!
Thanks Gary. Actually I could've applied some panning with my portable EQ mount. But the mount was polar aligned and reserved for some other imaging plans so didn't use it for panning. Worse still the sky clouded out at around 3am and I packed up everything, after which the sky cleared up again...
Clear skies please...
jimmyleong
Posts: 162
Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 12:12 am

Post by jimmyleong »

thats nice.... how did you do that? is there a software or what?
User avatar
jiahao1986
Posts: 474
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 10:59 pm
Location: Clementi

Post by jiahao1986 »

jimmyleong wrote:thats nice.... how did you do that? is there a software or what?
Hi Jimmy,

This video consists of 218 images taken with my camera. I set the camera to continuously shoot 30s exposures.

In the post processing I used Photoshop to batch resize the photos to reduce the processing load when rendering the video. Then I used Quicktime Pro to render all these single images (frames) into a 15fps video. The whole thing is acutually quite easy.
Clear skies please...
User avatar
Tachyon
Posts: 2038
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 11:40 am
Location: Bedok

Post by Tachyon »

Very smooth video!

Have you tried to lower the ISO to 1600 to reduce the light pollution?
[80% Steve, 20% Alfred] ------- Probability of Clear Skies = (Age of newest equipment in days) / [(Number of observers) * (Total Aperture of all telescopes present in mm)]
User avatar
jiahao1986
Posts: 474
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 10:59 pm
Location: Clementi

Post by jiahao1986 »

Tachyon wrote:Very smooth video!

Have you tried to lower the ISO to 1600 to reduce the light pollution?
Hey dude,

Actually I intended to capture some meteors, thus blew up the ISO to 3200 and kept shooting at f/2.8. Indeed one very long meteor is captured in one frame. You can watch the highest resolution version of the video on Youtube and pay close attention at around the 4th second. There's a very long green meteor on the upper left.

If you can't see, then can try the version on flickr. Flickr seems to encode the video better...

http://www.flickr.com/photos/34615469@N04/6017542693/
Clear skies please...
jimmyleong
Posts: 162
Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 12:12 am

Post by jimmyleong »

guess 30secs for f2.8 is kind of max for not getting star trail right?
User avatar
rcj
Vendor
Posts: 3043
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 1:46 am
Location: Katong
Contact:

Post by rcj »

i like this video very much, Jia Hao! thks for sharing!
Photon Bucket
http://www.celestialportraits.com
Facebook page: celestialportraits
User avatar
jiahao1986
Posts: 474
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 10:59 pm
Location: Clementi

Post by jiahao1986 »

jimmyleong wrote:guess 30secs for f2.8 is kind of max for not getting star trail right?
Hi Jimmy,

There's the following thread started by weixing providing a guide for deciding the correct exposures. For practical modern mega-mega-pixel cameras to avoid trails at 100% zoom, you probably will need to reduce the numbers by at least half.

http://www.singastro.org/viewtopic.php?t=3800

Actually when I zoom to 100% on the single frames which are taken with 15mm focal length at 30s exposure, stars near the celestial euqator show obvious trails already...
Clear skies please...
User avatar
jiahao1986
Posts: 474
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 10:59 pm
Location: Clementi

Post by jiahao1986 »

rcj wrote:i like this video very much, Jia Hao! thks for sharing!
Thanks Remus!
Clear skies please...
User avatar
starfinder
Posts: 1039
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: River Valley / Tanglin Road
Contact:

Post by starfinder »

Thanks for sharing the info Jiahao!

To add a point on Jimmy's question, one would usually use a handheld device called an intervalometer. This would be set to make the dSLR take multiple photos at particular intervals, eg one 30s shot, followed by a 5 sec pause, then another shot, to be repeated X number of times. I got one last year but so far hav only taken daytime timelapse photos of clouds and sunsets.

You could buy these from camera shops, suited to your camera brand. I think around $80 to $130. Some higher end cameras hav the interval feature built-in so the separate device isnt necessary.
Post Reply