Light Pollution filters for DSLR imaging in Singapore?

CCD vs Film? Lots of time vs no patience? Alright, this is your place to discuss all the astrophotography what's and what's not. You can discuss about techniques, accessories, cameras, whatever....just make sure you also post some nice photos here too!
User avatar
cloud_cover
Posts: 1170
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:08 pm
Favourite scope: 94.5", f/24 Ritchey-Chretien Reflector
Location: Restaurant At the End of the Universe

Light Pollution filters for DSLR imaging in Singapore?

Post by cloud_cover »

I was wondering if either narrowband (Lumicon UHC, Astronomik UHC) or line fiters (OIII) will be useful when imaging in Singapore with my DSLR. I don't think the broadband filters will do very much as far as imaging DSOs and defeating the light pollution is concerned - I have a Lumicon Deep Sky and an Orion Skyglow and visually I must say they don't make much difference here!
What do you guys think?
I'm not about to spend on CCDs at the moment so Ha and SII are definitely out of the question for me at the moment (unless you guys have experience to the contrary?)
Come to think of it: while filters are expensive, one 2" filter costs 'only' 5 trips to Punggai, so if it works well, it "buys" me more nights to image with :)
Thanks!
User avatar
orly_andico
Posts: 1616
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:14 pm
Location: Braddell Heights
Contact:

Post by orly_andico »

problem with the DSLR is the piss-poor sensitivity to Ha, unless you remove the IR blocking filter.

I think the killer app for defeating light pollution is a narrow-band Ha filter, plus a modded DSLR.
User avatar
cloud_cover
Posts: 1170
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:08 pm
Favourite scope: 94.5", f/24 Ritchey-Chretien Reflector
Location: Restaurant At the End of the Universe

Post by cloud_cover »

Hahaha! I guessed yo'd be the first to answer :)
Yeah, unfortunately I don't dare to mod my D700 since I use it so much for regular photography.
I've seen some really nice pics with Ha + OIII combined in a modded camera. Ah well. Of course I could just expose about 50x longer or bump the ISO up 6 stops and deal witht he noise...
DON'T PANIC
kochu
Posts: 817
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 9:51 pm
Favourite scope: Sharpstar-107PH Triplet.
Location: Jurong West

Astrophotography

Post by kochu »

I think the biggest hinderence to AP in Singapore is not LP. It is the clouds. So frankly we just donot get enough nights for AP.

So any investment in filters for AP in Singapore is money down the drain.

My 2 C.

Kochu/22-11-10
qinjuehang2
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 10:31 am
Location: NUS High

Post by qinjuehang2 »

You could get the x-nite CC-1 filter after modification. You'd have to be adventurous though, and you will need to recalibrate your autofocus or something along the lines of that.
User avatar
cloud_cover
Posts: 1170
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:08 pm
Favourite scope: 94.5", f/24 Ritchey-Chretien Reflector
Location: Restaurant At the End of the Universe

Post by cloud_cover »

kochu --> Agrree wholeheartedly! Havign said that, having SOME nights in Singapore is better than taking a chance in Punggai on monthly trips!
Speaking of which, does anyone have an Astronmik CLS or Lumicon UHC or IDAS LPS that I might be able to borrow to evaluate? :)
DON'T PANIC
kochu
Posts: 817
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 9:51 pm
Favourite scope: Sharpstar-107PH Triplet.
Location: Jurong West

IDAS LPS

Post by kochu »

Hi c-c,

I have 2 inch IDAS LPS filter. You can try it out. (Who knows, You may even like it. !!!!!)

Kochu/22-11-10
User avatar
weixing
Super Moderator
Posts: 4708
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 12:22 am
Favourite scope: Vixen R200SS & Celestron 6" F5 Achro Refractor
Location: (Tampines) Earth of Solar System in Orion Arm of Milky Way Galaxy in Local Group Galaxies Cluster

Post by weixing »

Hi,
IDAS is very effective, but there will be colour shift if you use it on a normal camera... I had one before, but my camera was not mod, so the colour went crazy... very difficult to adjust it back in PP as the colour shift was non-linear.

Anyway, IMHO, it's possible to get decent result in Singapore without LPS filter... you need to know your imaging site and know your camera well.

By the way, you can buy a used Canon xxxD body and mod it for astro use lor... I'm plan to mod my Canon 450D once I got my replacement DSLR.

Have a nice day.
Yang Weixing
:mrgreen: "The universe is composed mainly of hydrogen and ignorance." :mrgreen:
User avatar
cloud_cover
Posts: 1170
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:08 pm
Favourite scope: 94.5", f/24 Ritchey-Chretien Reflector
Location: Restaurant At the End of the Universe

Post by cloud_cover »

Hmm.... I wonder if a custom white balance with the IDAS on a white wall in sunlight will allow for the color difference...
DON'T PANIC
User avatar
wucheeyiun
Posts: 1758
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: marine parade
Contact:

Post by wucheeyiun »

weixing wrote:Hi,
IDAS is very effective, but there will be colour shift if you use it on a normal camera... I had one before, but my camera was not mod, so the colour went crazy... very difficult to adjust it back in PP as the colour shift was non-linear.

Anyway, IMHO, it's possible to get decent result in Singapore without LPS filter... you need to know your imaging site and know your camera well.

By the way, you can buy a used Canon xxxD body and mod it for astro use lor... I'm plan to mod my Canon 450D once I got my replacement DSLR.

Have a nice day.
I am thinking to mod my d70 too ... to remove the built - in IR cut filter ... but very costly to get hydrogen-alpha filter in order to work properly.

http://www.astrosurf.com/~buil/d70/ircut.htm

http://www.astronomik.com/en/astronomik ... ilter.html

i think the stand-alone mod DSLR is the best option for portable astrophotography ...
Post Reply